Needs when it comes to content of this systematic work for the pupil. The part regarding the manager

Needs when it comes to content of this systematic work for the pupil. The part regarding the manager

The requirements for assessing pupil research

1. The therapy regarding the research. It’s important that even though with the systemic and integration approaches, it ought to be a work with therapy, without an evident bias in management generally, advertising, pedagogy, law, philology, etc.

2. The degree of relevance and practical need for the study problems.

3. The degree of elaboration of theoretical product: overview of the literary works, comprehensively showing the developments of domestic and foreign boffins with this topic. Not just the literature referencing is welcomed, but additionally analysis, contrast and benchmarking the various views of experts, based on that your student formulates the writer’s place.

4. The connection between theoretical and material that is empirical. Relevance of the study at the mercy of its content.

5. collection of diagnostic tools and research test.

6. The degree of research outcomes.

7. The amount of interpretation of research outcomes (level of analysis).

8. The standard of tips provided by the pupil potential audience.

9. Quality of work’s design.

10. The amount of research’s independence. The research ought to be carried out because of the pupil individually, with all the participation of other individuals only as topics or professionals. Duplication and copying of studies carried out by other writers (plagiarism) is strictly prohibited. The existence of components of Independent creativity that is scientific the formula and reason of their very own way of solving the debatable problems for the concept and training of therapy, the separate nature of this presentation of this product together with formula of conclusions on the basis of the outcomes of the research are valued.

11. innovative approach. You can find subjects which are examined in various combinations by students from year to 12 months – they may not be valued. An interesting subject is valued, the selection of revolutionary techniques, author’s techniques and just about every other manifestation of imagination.

Work might be considered unsatisfactory by the after criteria.

1. scientific studies are maybe maybe not emotional.

2. The research subject will not match its content.

3. The study had not been carried out or partially carried out. Its answers are maybe maybe maybe not prepared or partially prepared. Its answers are prepared, although not interpreted, or partially interpreted. The theoretical component will not match the empirical.

4. The text associated with the work doesn’t meet with the demands of this design tradition: there are a great number of spelling errors, the writing will not be modified, sloppy created.

5. The research is a complete or partial plagiarism. In the event that term paper is thought to be unsatisfactory, it really is came back to your student for modification.

In the event that pupil would not pass the initial protection or even the commission discovered the task unsatisfactory, the pupil isn’t permitted to protect and it is expelled through the college..

Duties for the manager of term and last qualifying work

According to the theme for the term paper or FQW (last qualifying work) manager:

– provides the pupil a job to organize for a phrase paper or perhaps a thesis, assists the pupil when you look at the growth of a calendar working arrangements for the whole amount of the FQW;

– advises to your student the mandatory fundamental literary works along with other sources from the theme;

– recommends the pupil regarding the range of diagnostic tools and drawing up an arrange for empirical research

– suggests the student from the company associated with research

– suggests the pupil in the processing and interpretation of empirical research outcomes

– checks the job in components so that as a complete.

– For FQW writes review to get results and recommends the reviewer. The reviewer is planning a summary of the job.

Dates and period of consultations are appointed by the manager or even the mind reviews associated with department. Attention! In the event that pupil failed to meet with the due dates set apart because of the dean’s workplace for term paper or FQW, the manager has got the right to not ever provide good advice.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *